h335 223 load data Secrets
h335 223 load data Secrets
Blog Article
two gr H335 and Remington BR primers. Worst accuracy arrived Along with the CCI #41 primers. I intend to chrono this load all over the Winter season into the heat of up coming summer to check out if nearly anything unusal pops up at the conclusion of the temperature extremes. Since it stands the Hornady 55gr FMJ bullet, any LC brass, 26.two gr H335 and Rem BR primers is my "Basic Goal" load.
The bigger permanent cavity could bring about speedier blood reduction. Whilst this kind of an edge Obviously exists, its significance cannot be quantified".
I'm new to reloading myself this yr for rifle. I do have more than 6000 rounds less than my belt this 12 months alone,So im nevertheless from the look for mode for expirence from all sources.
The short article relates the near destruction (bolt lugs set back together with other problems) of a custom gun from slight excursions beyond reloading handbook maximums for the duration of a ladder screening course of action. This was using H335 and the author was chasing velocity in the course of load development.
My load with Hornady fifty five-gr bullets was fantastic, but his Along with the Noslers (in a Rem seven hundred VS) wasn't. Incredibly hot temps + a bullet that tends to build extra strain + distinctive rifle. Backing off not less than 0.five to 25.five or a lot less would clear up his strain challenges. In the case of an individual making use of Federal .223 Rem brass which has been mentioned for resulting in stress concerns as a result of It is thicker partitions and thinner Website region, a lowered load is unquestionably suggested. This can be why some posters have distinct final results with loads that are only fantastic for others. The vast majority of handloaders who've no means of chronographing their function-ups for a strategy for obtaining a handle on force within their guns with their components. When force indications appear about the brass and/or primer, then regretably excessive stress is currently existing. Keeping track of the chronograph ordinary velocities allows you realize when expected maximum velocity continues to be reached. In such a case It might be in the region of 3107 fps if you average out all 5 resources. Thus backing off a tiny bit will Usually stay clear of this and it is utilizing very good feeling. Just one great way of getting a superior deal with on what your limitations needs to be should be to average data from each of the sources you can get. In this instance, averaging all five sources gives an average highest cost body weight of 25 grains at 3107 fps. In the event you had been to toss out the "odd" utmost demand body weight of Hornady plus the "odd" low velocity of Sierra you'd get this ordinary: 25.5 grains at 3134 fps - which I do think could be a little much more practical figures for barrels during the 20-22" range from what I've seen. That is certainly why I like to consult as quite a few data sources as feasible ahead of environment plans to get a load function-up. Furthermore, a single really should research and see In case the picked components can insert to tension (Federal .223 brass, Nosler Ballistic Strategies, M193 bullets and so forth.) Of course this discussion just isn't about discovering your "precision node" but just demand/pressure/velocity objectives or ceilings. Nevertheless in my case, accuracy appears to boost with will increase in demand bodyweight when loading H-335. Commence loads like 23 to twenty five grains are only so-so, but loads like twenty five.five are Great for me. I believe that the bullet utilised would make A much bigger difference than the demand body weight. *While some Observe that 26.0 grains is a "5.fifty six NATO-pressure" load - During this specific scenario it is apparent that genuine five.56 NATO-force ammo - LC M193 essentially is way hotter and ninety fps speedier In this particular particular AR15. This could certainly only be established through the chronograph or a pressure barrel.
Quoted: Try out shifting the oal out slightly but not more than the max oal, most moments this will likely greatly have an effect on precision. but you must begin lower then get the job done up yet again
When your telling me the xbt data is similar for that tsx/ttsx i will go on up the ladder and Examine and recheck as i go... is head Area moving out .004 of an inch anything to bother with, all primers looked good the belt within the circumstance was essentially considerably less lower than the manufacturing unit winchester rounds.
I'v read through loading all copper bullets: back again off cost two complete grains and thin read through A further that claims the grooves inside the ttsx allows you to load hogdon h335 similar to any bullet of identical excess weight???
I also experienced some problems With all the quick H335 powder biking the motion so I did not go after testing the H335 Together with the Les Baer.
2 grains and not exceed 3100 fps. The outcome posted inside the manual for an extended barrel do yield increased values, however it would seem that the worth of your NATO ammunition in that barrel would generate even larger values.
This is an more mature thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an outdated thread. Remember to look at creating a new thread.
I weigh Examine on the dimensions, one out of every 10 I cost with powder by dumping the demand out within the pan, confirming the charge weight after which you can putting the powder back in the situation.
I need to end the function up on it to get rid of the can I've and acquire the data for situations such as this when You cannot be picky.
Then equally of them tried a lot of the plastic tips, and altered their minds. The moment I tried Benchmark and Ramshot TAC while in the .223 my remaining H335 went unused. And at present you'll find even more thoroughly clean-burning suited powders.